Retractable Leashes – when to (and not to) use one
The first iteration of the retractable lead was called a “leading device” and was patented in America all the way back in 1908. This idea didn’t really gain popularity until a German engineer made significant updates to its functionality and overall design in the 1970s.
I recall the first time I saw one. It was the now highly recognizable Flexi brand that often stands in as a term for all retractable leads – such has been its popularity in the decades since. It’s not hard to see why, when I first encountered them, I thought this was a brilliant idea, too!
Dogs desperately want and need to sniff. This often interferes with the human desire to walk at a consistent pace without stopping to wait on the dog to sniff, snuffle, and snort every so many steps. When your wants in a walk are: stays at a steady pace, no stopping and no pulling, you want to give the dog the ability to range outwards; a leash that extends to allow your dog to go some distance from you while maintaining control…well, it seems perfect, doesn’t it?
Unfortunately, retractable leashes aren’t perfect. They’re a big problem for guardians, dogs, children, other pets, wildlife, and bystanders. They’re such a problem that many guardians, members of the non-dog public, and professionals alike harbor a deep hatred for them and would even like to see them banned.
We’re going to talk about the ethics of retractable leashes – why they’re a problem, when to use them, and when not to use them.

Why Retractable Leashes are a Problem
Retractable leashes are not evil objects. They’re simply tools, and like many tools, they become dangerous when used in situations they were never designed for.
The issue isnโt that dogs love sniffing. (And, they absolutely do. Sniffing lowers heart rate and stress hormones, and is cognitively enriching. They really do need to engage in sniffing!) The issue is physics.
A retractable leash combines:
- Thin cord or tape under tension
- A plastic handle with a mechanical brake
- Variable distance (often 10โ26 feet)
- Constant line pressure
That combination creates several predictable risks.
Documented Human Injuries
The injuries associated with retractable leashes are not hypothetical; they’re documented over the decades of their popularity.
A 2009 study published in the Journal of Emergency Medicine analyzed injuries related to retractable leashes in the U.S. and found thousands of emergency department visits over five years.
The most common injuries included:
- Rope burns and lacerations
- Finger amputations
- Facial injuries
- Falls resulting in fractures
In 2020, a study published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery โ Global Open reviewed leash-related injuries from 2001โ2018 and found more than 422,000 emergency department visits in the United States.
Injuries were often caused by:
- The leash wrapping around hands or legs
- Sudden jerks from dogs reaching the end of the line
- Hand entrapment in the retractable mechanism
The thin cord under tension can act like a cutting wire. Severe finger injuries โ including partial amputations โ are well documented. (Though the “tape” version, which has a wider, flatter line seems somewhat safer, it comes with all the same injury risks as the thin cord.)
Even when the injury is โjustโ a fall, it can mean broken wrists, concussions, or facial fractures. This is particularly in older adults.
Example:
A 2009 study published in the Journal of Emergency Medicine analyzed injuries related to retractable leashes and found thousands of emergency department visits over a five-year period.1
A later review of emergency department data from 2001โ2018 identified over 422,000 leash-related injuries in the United States.2
Injuries to Dogs
Dogs themselves are also at risk from retractable leash use. As a dog guardian and professional caretaker of beloved dogs belonging to others, it is a terrifying thought that a tool meant to give a dog an enjoyable, enriching time could end up being the cause of terror, injury, or even worse. Unfortunately, that is too frequently the reality.
Common scenarios include:
- Sprinting to the end of the line and experiencing abrupt neck or back force
- Becoming entangled around legs, poles, other dogs, or wildlife
- Running into the street before the guardian can engage the brake
- Being unable to retreat quickly from a trigger (reactive encounter)
Sudden deceleration at full extension can create significant cervical strain โ especially if attached to a collar rather than a harness. Even on a harness, the force can twist or torque the body. This extreme force can also jerk the handle from the guardian’s grasp, and the dog’s panic at being “chased” by the bouncing, noisy handle can cause them to attempt to flee and/or hide, resulting in lost dogs. The internet is full of lost-and-found dog postings with retractable leashes attached, and last year, drone-based services like this one gained greater recognition for finding particularly challenging lost dogs…with retractables still attached.
There are also documented cases of:
- Cord slicing into legs
- Tail injuries
- Panic reactions when tension remains constant
Because retractables are always under tension unless locked, they also tend to teach dogs to pull continuously.3 From a learning theory perspective, that constant pressure becomes part of the walking equation. If the leash pays out when they lean into it, pulling is reinforced.4 This is another reason why behaviorists and trainers do not recommend their use; they’re teaching your dog the opposite of safer, better leash skills.
Risk to Children, Bystanders, and Other Animals
As you probably can surmise by this point, it’s the retractable leash’s long, thin cord that poses a severe risk to anyone within range, on top of the issue of uncontrollable range itself.
If a person:
- Walks into it
- Bicycles through it
- Doesnโt see it stretched across a path
Injury can, and often does, occur. Additionally, the thinness of the cord makes it difficult to see – neither people nor animals can even attempt to avoid what they don’t see until it is too late.
It can:
- Burn skin
- Trip pedestrians
- Strike a child at neck height
- Tangle another dog
Other pets are also at risk. A dog on 20 feet of thin line can reach another dog long before the guardian can physically intervene. Even when dogs aren’t acting aggressively, the cord can cause harm to dog legs, tails, and anything else it wraps around – potentially even causing a fight. Wildlife, too, suddenly becomes within range and is in danger. Then, there are cats. Regardless of your opinion of cats being outdoors, there is no excuse for a dog to attack a loose cat – retractable leashes often make it possible. (Not to mention the danger to the increasing number of cats out on leash with their guardians. This is a responsible way of giving applicable cats outdoor enrichment, and they deserve to be safe while out “on a walk” as well.)
In high-arousal situations, reaction time matters โ and retractables add delay.
Loss of True Control
Many guardians believe the brake equals control. That’s not an unreasonable assumption; on the surface, and with our experience with other brakes, it seems to make sense. Unfortunately, that’s not the reality.
Mechanical brakes fail. Hands slip. Dogs lunge faster than thumbs react. If a 60-pound dog hits the end of a 16-foot line at full speed, the physics are not in the humanโs favor.
The longer the leash, the greater the acceleration. The greater the acceleration, the greater the force at impact.
This is not a moral issue. Itโs math, and the numbers are not in favor of maintaining true control.

When Retractable Leashes Can Be Used Responsibly
Despite the risks, there are contexts where retractable leashes can be used thoughtfully.
The key variables are:
- Environment
- Dog training level
- Dog size and strength
- Handler ability
- Equipment choice (what’s your dog wearing?)
* I know, the picture accompanying this section does not display a dog wearing a harness! While I strongly advise and advocate for harnesses, that is not every guardian’s choice at this time. The dog pictured, Sailor, is a sitting client. Sailor is extraordinarily calm, well-trained, and typically goes off-leash. Thus, wearing a collar with ID is a good option for her. She is as safe as possible a choice to walk this way, and I use her leash out of an abundance of caution – because dogs are dogs, often just the reminder, “You’re attached to a human friend,” is sufficient as it is with her.

In Rural or Low-Traffic Areas
Wide open, low-traffic country roads or large empty fields can reduce risk significantly โ if:
- There are no nearby dogs
- There is no road access
- Wildlife risk is low
- The dog has a reliable recall
In these contexts, the retractable leash can function like a convenience long line.
However, many trainers would argue that an actual long line (15โ30 feet of biothane or nylon) provides better feedback, visibility, and control.
Controlled Recall Training
In enclosed spaces (empty baseball fields, fenced areas, large quiet parks at off hours), a retractable can sometimes be used as a recall backup.
That said, most positive reinforcement trainers prefer a traditional long line for skill-building because:
- It does not stay under tension
- It allows for clean reinforcement timing
- It avoids a sudden mechanical snap-back
Professionals such as Victoria Stilwell and Karen Pryor advocate for long lines during recall training rather than retractables for this reason.
Potty Access for Elderly or Disabled Guardians
For individuals with mobility limitations, a retractable leash may allow a dog to:
- Range to a preferred potty spot
- Sniff and eliminate at a distance
- Maintain some level of containment
In these cases:
- The dog should be calm and non-reactive
- A front-clip or well-fitted harness should be used
- The environment should be predictable and low traffic
This is a pragmatic use case where safety can be managed. It’s important for beloved, well-cared-for pets to remain in safe homes. Used properly, this tool can mean that an elderly or disabled guardian can keep their dog. Dogs stay in good homes, and those in particular need of their companionship, motivation to be active, and documented health benefits for dog guardians continue to receive these benefits.

When NOT to Use a Retractable Leash
Below are situations in which a retractable should absolutely NOT be used due to the inherently high risk it presents.
In Busy Neighborhoods or Urban Areas
Sidewalks, apartment complexes, trails, festivals, school zones โ these environments contain:
- Children
- Other dogs
- Cyclists
- Cars
The unpredictability is too high. Six feet is a socially responsible default in public. Twenty feet is not.

With Reactive Dogs
Dogs who:
- Bark or lunge at other dogs
- Are fearful of strangers
- Have barrier frustration
These dogs need close, predictable handling. Retractables delay response and increase arc distance during lunges. Again, making this too high a risk for responsible use.
For reactive dogs, shorter fixed-length leashes (4โ6 feet) paired with reinforcement-based behavior modification are significantly safer. (And a far better recipe for success in treating reactivity instead of potentially worsening it!)
With High Prey Drive Dogs
If your dog will:
- Bolt after squirrels
- Chase deer
- Fixate on cats
Remember that a retractable leash increases momentum before you can respond.
That acceleration can mean:
- Road entry
- Shoulder injury
- Handler fall
- Harm to other animals
Prey drive plus mechanical delay is not a safe combination for anyone involved, and additionally, these leashes allow dogs to “practice” a dangerous behavior.

With Large, Powerful, or Untrained Dogs
If a guardian cannot comfortably:
- Hold the leash in one hand
- Stop forward momentum immediately
- Prevent sudden lunges
A retractable is inappropriate.
Power + distance = amplified force. Again, this is just science! Not a judgement on your dog’s breed, size, or where they’re at in learning and why. The worst thing you can do for powerful breed types who already have an unfair bias against them is to prove that correct by not having control over your dog responsibly. This doesn’t mean your dog is dangerous; they may be just dying to go see everyone, but their retractable leash is dangerous.
Attached to a Collar
Even in appropriate environments, retractables should not be attached to a flat collar. This is very unsafe.
Sudden tension can cause:
- Tracheal damage
- Cervical strain
- Thyroid injury
A well-fitted Y-front harness is significantly safer to use with any leash, but especially a retractable one.
While we are more aware of tracheal damage in small and toy breeds, we’re not aware enough of how easy it occurs in all other dog sizes as well. Tracheal damage, cervical strain, and thyroid injury are all very serious, potentially deadly consequences. Go with the harness!
*This blog is against the use of prong and choke collars, no matter the leash attached, but I see guardians publicly using them with retractable leads. I cannot stress enough how incredibly dangerous and inhumane this practice is – please do NOT do this.

The Ethical Question
The real ethical question is not, โShould these be banned?โ It’s, “Am I using this tool ethically?”
Used in a responsible, ethical fashion, retractable leashes do have a place and purpose.
Retractables appeal to us because they feel tidy and effortless. But safety and skill often look slightly less convenient.
- Slack in the leash
- Clear communication
- Safer handling mechanics
And thatโs okay. We call it “pet parenting” and “guardianship” because those are true reflections of our relationship with our dogs. Just like parenting or guardianship of a human child, things are rarely tidy and effortless!
The appeal is understandable. My dog isn’t perfect, either! That’s right, the blog mascot, Tater, is only appropriate for retractable leash use in the backyard or out in the country. The imagery of allowing him to happily sniff his way down the street, going to and fro as his herding genes tell him to, no ultra-perceptible restriction – it’s very appealing! However, the realistic and responsible assessment is poor; that appealing idea wouldn’t be the reality.
The reality is that putting my young, high-drive herding dog on a retractable leash without more solid communication, recall, and walking skills would be a poor experience for both of us, dangerous for anyone around, and solidly unethical.
I promise, it’s really okay if your dog isn’t there yet, either! In my experience, most are not, and many never will be applicable responsibly. That’s just fine; there are plenty of other ways to get those sniffs in. Tater and I sure do!
Bottom Line
Retractable leashes are not universally evil. They’re just a tool that needs to be used correctly and in the correct environments.
They are:
- High-risk in public, busy, or unpredictable spaces
- Inappropriate for reactive or untrained dogs
- Physically dangerous when misused
- Occasionally, reasonable in controlled, low-risk environments
The most humane choice is not about brand loyalty, personal preference, or ease of guardianship responsibilities. Itโs about situational awareness.
And if your goal is enrichment?
There are safer ways to give dogs the world โ one sniff at a time.
References
This article references peer-reviewed research and published injury data.
- OโBrien, D. C., et al. (2009). Dog leash-related injuries treated in United States emergency departments. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 37(1), 34โ39.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.09.053 - Rhea, S., et al. (2020). Leash-related injuries in the United States: 2001โ2018. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery โ Global Open, 8(9).
https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003070 - The effects of leash tension on canine behavior and stress signals. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 9(5), 201โ207.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2014.05.002 - Rooney, N. J., & Cowan, S. (2011). Training methods and their association with behavior and welfare in dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 132(3โ4), 169โ177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.04.005
